Jump to content

Talk:History of Colombia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Summary Reads like a Political Essay, Not a Summary

[edit]

The summary at the top of the page is interesting but is too long and goes into too much detail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.34.35.48 (talk) 17:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

[edit]

The summary at the top of the page seems to be a complete cut and paste from this site: http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-2981.html I suggest change. 98.111.78.51 (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which in turn derives from the US Library of Congress. An interesting analysis, but otherwise so ridiculously opinionated nobody in his/her right mind ough to put in an encyclopedia. 81.241.37.220 (talk) 03:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:History of Colombia/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==Assessment== This is a high-quality "start" page, but needs a good deal of cleanup, including in its internal logic. Could be bumped up to a "B" with some solid dusting, working on flow, and adding multimedia. Hwonder talk contribs 01:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 01:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 17:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Colombia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Under the section "The National Front Regime (1958-1974)", the first sentence in the second paragraph reads:

"The National Front ended "La Violencia", and National Front administrations attempted to institute far-reaching social and economic reforms in cooperation with the Alliance for Progress"

There is no link for Alliance for Progress. Is this the same Alliance for Progress as in this wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_for_Progress? If so, the sentence could be clarified to reflect that it was an international/U.S.-led plan (if that in fact was the case - I am not sure what exactly the Alliance for Progress was), plus it could be linked to the corresponding wikipedia page.

Ylok (talk) 16:31, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]